Read-only archive of the Armageddon Games Forums Archive (2000–2026) · About this archive
Armageddon Games Forums Archive

The Dimentio and Anarchy Show

248 replies · 212,493 views · Started 05 March 2018

James24 20 Mar 2018, 01:16

Its more like a cease-fire. Everyone has depleted their weapons and is tired. But make no mistake, the underlying root cause of the conflict remains unsolved and so long as it is there, then there will always be these lovely bitching sessions. Type B quest makers making quests for type A players ALWAYS ignites conflict - from Isle of Rebirth to Zelda 3 to Liberation of Hyrule to Armageddon Quest. Fundamentally, type B quests cater for extreme tastes that the vast majority find intolerable. And I can't foresee any solution to this problem as long as the standard response is - "Nah - type A and type B don't exist. We are one as equals".

Dimentio 20 Mar 2018, 01:59

I mean the reason this thread was made has very little to do with Zelda 3 and more to do with my problems with the author's obsessive stalkerish attitude and inability to take the fact that I didn't like his grinding-required quest. This problem was never about Type A/Type B, never about me finding his quest unappealing in looks nor in difficulty. People might be more willing to take Type A/B more seriously if you didn't suggest it was the magical solution to every conflict.

Tamamo 20 Mar 2018, 02:16

Nah they're all pissed drunk from St. Patricks day problably. That was saturday afterall.
After they recover from their drunken stupors it will continue.
And we will continue to watch sitting her with our popcorn.

Anarchy_Balsac 20 Mar 2018, 13:05

Dimentio wrote:I mean the reason this thread was made has very little to do with Zelda 3 and more to do with my problems with the author's obsessive stalkerish attitude and inability to take the fact that I didn't like his grinding-required quest. This problem was never about Type A/Type B, never about me finding his quest unappealing in looks nor in difficulty. People might be more willing to take Type A/B more seriously if you didn't suggest it was the magical solution to every conflict.

Buddy, YOU'RE the one who won't leave ME alone. You held a grudge about years old drama that had little (if anything) to do with you and wouldn't stop starting shit with me over it, then cried when I made fun of your sorry, lonely ass life and got your buddies from Pure to gang up on me b/c taking me on by yourself wasn't emotionally satisfying enough. Notice how you're still bringing this up even when I have dropped it?

Dimentio 20 Mar 2018, 14:56

Anarchy_Balsac wrote:Buddy, YOU'RE the one who won't leave ME alone. You held a grudge about years old drama that had little (if anything) to do with you and wouldn't stop starting shit with me over it, then cried when I made fun of your sorry, lonely ass life and got your buddies from Pure to gang up on me b/c taking me on by yourself wasn't emotionally satisfying enough. Notice how you're still bringing this up even when I have dropped it?

I mean, there's also the fact that you reviewbombed my quests simply because I rated your quest poorly, proceeded to delude yourself into thinking that I was the stalker, and then insulted one of my online buddies; and the fact that you still have the "victim position" because you don't have the balls to man up that you're a whiny little stalker bitch. What the fuck? LMAO.

Anarchy_Balsac 21 Mar 2018, 21:03

Dimentio wrote:I mean, there's also the fact that you reviewbombed my quests simply because I rated your quest poorly, proceeded to delude yourself into thinking that I was the stalker, and then insulted one of my online buddies; and the fact that you still have the "victim position" because you don't have the balls to man up that you're a whiny little stalker bitch. What the fuck? LMAO.

So RESPONDING to someone else's obsession = being obsessed?

k.

Tamamo 23 Mar 2018, 00:50

Nothing wrong with being obsessed. As obsession is a perverse pinnacle of love and nothing wrong with being a pervert either.
So therefore we can assume that you both are yandere for one another and this story has one hell of an ending.
Just remember everyone.
All is fair in love in war. And the mean the same damn thing most the time.

Moosh 23 Mar 2018, 14:40

So we're shipping Dimentio and Anarchy now? This is where we've ended up?

I can get behind this solution. Time to make with the fanfiction, people. :P

Tamamo 24 Mar 2018, 13:34

[MENTION=38634]Chris Miller[/MENTION] So are we gonna bring back ask someone who get's laid next.

Shane 24 Mar 2018, 16:10

[MENTION=42714]Gleeok[/MENTION]: Wasn't really going to post in here again and I don't intend on having this post spark a argument, I just want to clarify that I genuinely had played at least half of the quest and gave a review back on the year it was released. It was only until last year I requested all my reviews to be deleted because 2/3 of them were pretty bad and outdated. I was writing up an actual review after playing it and I have the notepad to prove it, I was writing something fairly large and tend to have a habit of leaving a rating before I post a review since I do take a bit of time with them and because PureZC treats ratings and reviews separately. Now was a 0 extreme? In retrospect, yeah. I probably would of bumped it to a 1 if I could post the review due to proper reflection after writing the review down. But I'm not going to admit something that wasn't my intent because frankly, I don't even know Anarchy personally enough to dislike him, I just think uploading that video was a dick move and merely wanted to point that out since it was the right thing to do. Now can you please not drag me into this nonsense again? This isn't even about the reviews at this rate. I only joined this nonsense for shitposts but more importantly because I wanted to clarify that Anarchy uploaded a video of an innocent person who doesn't even know what's going on and got sidetracked by some type a/type b nonsense. If you wanna believe I review bombed, that's perfectly fine, I don't blame anyone who'd think that but I was going to post that review if the quest remained public. I will however will be no longer taking part in this nonsense if that makes you feel any better as I had been doing prior to this. Sorry for the long post, but I really wanted to clarify on a misunderstanding here, it was an easy conclusion to jump to so I take some blame, but I didn't anticipate that I wasn't going to be able to post my review. :P

Also as a side note, Anarchy called out one of the nicest people in the ZC community, calling him an idiot a month or so ago and admitted that he tried to get his rating (2 stars, I think) and well thought out review removed on his other quest showing that this is more about negative ratings in general than review bombing. :shrug: