Read-only archive of the Armageddon Games Forums Archive (2000–2026) · About this archive

So...

7457 replies · 1,886,047 views · Started 21 May 2007

biggiy05 wrote:Strong, muscular women are sexy but you have to draw the line somewhere. This is not sexy.
User posted image

I just want to know who she is. O: Yeah, she's beyond the point where more muscle becomes less attractive, but she's not that bad.

odinson wrote:😱didn't even know women came that big, or maybe it's a tranny?

There are bigger women than her. I took a percocet and I'm enjoying the buzz that took away the pain. If I do a google search I'll kill my drug induced happiness.

Shazza Dani wrote:I just want to know who she is. O: Yeah, she's beyond the point where more muscle becomes less attractive, but she's not that bad.

Google image search.

Gah... You know, Google Earth is just surreal sometimes. Like the whole ability to look up your childhood home that you haven't seen in over a decade, go to street view, and see the renovations the new owners have made to it.

They also added ocean floors. And Mars, but not our own moon. Google Earth is cool because I like to mark all the mad, angry furiously awesome places my friends and I go to on our epic quests for glory.

...I've never tried anything from White Castle. Mostly because none seem to exist out here. 😞

I'm having some fun participating in the Anime Grand Prix. Right now, my chosen contender is Garchomp. Yes, the Pokemon. I entered it into the contest mostly for lulz. It is loads of fun being given permission to spam another board's threads with zillions of FLYING GODDAMNED SHARKS. 😛

Garchomp's current match-up -- Vs. Reimu (Touhou)

It looks like it's the end of the line for the flying land shark, though. Being up against both shark-haters and loli-lovers means that it would take at least a dozen or so people to turn the tide. Oh well, at least the Chomp managed to take down a giant space loli, a hikkikomori, and Hatsune Miku. :V

What is the Anime Grand Prix? When I click on that link it says "You do not have permission to view this topic", and I don't feel like registering or whatever.

It's an anime character contest. People nominate, then vote for different characters, with people making predictions on which ones make it through. Yes, it's stupid, and more or less like an anime version of the prediction contests held annually for the Super Bowl. Some of the things people come up with to entice votes, though, are hilariously awesome.

Anyone or anything that makes an appearance in any kind of anime becomes a potential competitor. Batman's a current competitor (currently set to battle against God), and Clint Eastwood & Charlton Heston were contenders (thanks to a cameo appearance in a comedy) who got knocked out earlier. (By the exact same god.)

And yeah, the threads are open only to people who have accounts. :S Google keeps copies of the threads, though. Like so. (I think that link should work.)

Guys… I just had a strange realisation. D:

I never questioned this before, but for some reason I was just thinking about it, and… Has anyone else ever noticed that The 'Cat in the Hat' bears virtually no resemblance to an actual cat? I'm kind of freaked out, like, who was this creepy thing from my childhood posing as a cat? Okay, it's not that freaky, but ol' Theodor Suess was a shitty artist.

so... i finally got my computer to boot up. I let my friend use my computer for a day, it comes back packed full of viruses and trojans. running my virus scanner right now. about 10 seconds and it deletes 15 things. still about an hour or 2 to go. ill post a screen shot of the results. its sure to be epic win lol.

The Cat in the Hat is more a metaphor for the cat-like fickle nature of childhood...or so my English teacher would say if given the chance.

The_Amaster wrote:or so my English teacher would say if given the chance.

Unfortunately, he never got the chance because he's currently stuffed in your basement freezer.

Am I right? You psycho, you. 😉

...I would be afraid to try. She's like, 60, four feet tall, has a grin creepier than ...a really creepy thing, and has an obsession with sex and death that borders on unhealthy.
Seriously, everything is either about sex, or death. Often times both. We haven't entered the realm of necrophilia yet, but I think its just a matter of time.

Alright, that's it - next person who says the Earth is less than 10,000 years old, or that life on Earth is less than 10,000 years old, is seriously getting a boot up their ass. Nothing personal Russ, this isn't directed at you. I'm just sick of all the crap that these people say and then claim it's science. Or worse yet, citing the Bible as proof of the Bible's veracity (of course the Bible is true, it says so in the Bible).

And seriously, even if there were a God, I don't think he'd be too keen on people lying in His name, which is exactly what these people are doing. Claiming the Earth is 10,000 years old is most definitely a lie, especially when you make up lies to to support your argument, and really, I just can't think of anything more offensive than lying in the name of your deity.

Whatever happened to that theory in which the 7 days of creation were really a re-creation? You know, the 4.5 billion years of demons living on earth, then Satan being cast out of Heaven, the Earth going dark, and then God recreating the world 6,000 years ago? They used to preach that shit on TBN every day.

Glen le Great wrote:Whatever happened to that theory in which the 7 days of creation were really a re-creation? You know, the 4.5 billion years of demons living on earth, then Satan being cast out of Heaven, the Earth going dark, and then God recreating the world 6,000 years ago? They used to preach that shit on TBN every day.

I've heard that one. Not entirely against it, no.

I don't really wanna start a new thread, so I'll just ask here. First, I'm a fairly average computer user. I use my computer mostly for dicking around, and the occasional gaming. My current specs are 2.66GHz processor with 2GB RAM, and a 256MB video card. This is fine for me, but I'm seriously thinking of getting a laptop.

The one I'm looking at has 4GB of RAM, and a ~4GHz processor. I would like more RAM more than anything, since after talking with my computer expert neighbor (the guy who gave me this computer) I learned the processor speed isn't really that important for general use. He said RAM is what really matters. if you have 4GB of RAM, there won't be a noticeable difference in performance between a 2GHz and a 4GHz processor. I dunno how true it is, but he seems to know his shit. It made sense. I guess I'd like the option for a more powerful processor.

Basically, I'm asking if this computer is worth it for your average Windows user who uses Media player, Firefox, and photo shop, watches movies, and plays the occasional 3D game.

It's a decent laptop, but probably way overpriced. I know you could build a better desktop for less money, but I don't know as much about laptops.