Mercy wrote:Sweetie, it sounds like your thong may be riding up. This is a forum with the title-draw of, wait for it..., video games. Odds are in Mr. Bedwell's favour that most people who take the time to reply to his survey will have some interest in video games. With the gross audience the internet puts at our fingertips, it would silly of any researcher not to take advantage when apropos. If Mr. Bedwell chose to ingratiate himself into several gaming sites before posting his request, he would be more liable to bias his responses and restrict the size of his survey pool. In the end, this is not different than passing out flyers in the quad' or posting them on physical, public bulletin boards. I checked up on this thread and Mr. Bedwell yesterday (even so far as to read one of his papers) and it all appears legitimate. He may not be trying to cure cancer but he is contributing to increasing the pool of human knowledge. And it's video games!
I am a little disappointed that our guest choose to get a little patronizing with Anthony. One would think a post-grad a little more understanding of the disgruntled nature of under-grad banter.
-mercy
It *is* different from putting flyers on the quad. When you do that you're soliciting for results in a public forum that's legitimately recognized as a place for such activities. This is sneaking in to the local pizza parlor and putting flyers on each table, then leaving before the owner notices. I still stand by my decision <😡>
Yes, it's a video game forum. But for someone that's supposedly got a vested interest in the psychology of gamers, this approach isn't a very good one. I'm no psych major, but I think we can find a middle ground with cultural anthropology.
Common qualities of gamers:
- Competitive - Gamers like to compare their performance to others.
- Territorial - Make a thread about how Genesis was superior to SNES and watch fur fly.
- Prideful - Braggadocio has been an element of gaming since the first game with a score.
- Cliquish - Gamers like to stick with people that have very similar interests. This comes from the not-so-distant era when gaming was an activity for losers.
These aren't exactly virtues, but they are what they are; it's interesting to consider the factors that led to this, but I don't want to waste that post right now. Take apart any significant gaming community online and you'll find everyone displays some of these attributes. If you want to be accepted in a gaming community, the quickest method is to showcase a feat that appeals to the competitive and prideful nature of the community: post a high score, video of a tough achievement, or even a well-thought-out challenge. A slower technique: appeal to the cliquish and territorial natures by lurking a bit, learning the sentiments of the board, and showing yourself to have similar beliefs. One really quick way: reciprocate.
The territorial gamer will let his guard down if he thinks there is some benefit to cooperation. I've seen plenty of forums ban surveys like yours on sight. I've seen others accept them only with mod approval *and* the promise of some benefit to a random participant; a common prize is some kind of forum trinket like an account upgrade the winner can show off (prideful/competitive!) On the other hand, if you're generally accepted as one of the "in" members, the solicitation might be ignored due to the benefit of keeping you as a member of the forum.
You, sir, signed up on October 1 and immediately posted this survey without taking any time to establish yourself as a potential valuable member of the community. "Hi, I'm a student can you take this survey?" is no way to approach a community of gamers. I'd eat my words if, while you were waiting on results, you had participated in a few other threads. However, this is the only thread in which you've posted, and your last activity was over a week ago. You solicited the community, took from it, then left without leaving anything in return. That violates all of the rules of our tight-knit gallery of rogues, and wouldn't sit well with many others.
Did you ever have a friend that would come over, drink a few beers, then go back home but never invite you over to his house? That's what you've been so far: that guy.
If you really wanted some results, you could have paid $10 for 2 domino's pizzas and parked your butt in front of a local used game store. 1 survey = 1 slice of pizza. That'd have been at least 15 willing participants in 10 minutes, without having to resort to the same sleazeball tactics used to peddle counterfeit nike shoes, ipods, viagra, and "online diplomas".
Get out. (Though it's a bit belated for that, isn't it?)
*edit*
And yes, I spent 6 days stewing over this response like a total loser. The kind of loser that's spent > 9 years on the same forum and seen it fall from hundreds of active members to tens. It's pretty heartbreaking to see a new member sign up then find out they're probably not interested in staying around. It's heartbreaking *and* disappointing to be chastised by forum staff for being upset that someone has signed up for the sole purpose of profiting from our eyeballs and mouse clicks with no desire to make the community more valuable.