Ohio School Computer Technician accused of buying kids for sexual torture

Holy shit. I completely agree. I can't believe someone would think like this and want to put the life of a child in that much harm. He needs to be locked up, away from everyone.

Lock em up and throw away da key! It's sick people like this who give the human race a bad name. This is just disturbing by far.

[from the article] "I just like watching the bubbles."

ha

Another perv off the street.

I don't even have to read the article to know what happened before I'm able to disagree with Prrkitty.

Everyone deserves a fair trial.

Glenn the Great wrote:I don't even have to read the article to know what happened before I'm able to disagree with Prrkitty.

Everyone deserves a fair trial.

You have some fucked up views in life. Your opinion doesn't count.

People get off on some freaky stuff and this isn't one of the worst things I've heard about but it's messed up.

biggiy05 wrote:You have some fucked up views in life.

If by "fucked up" you mean "constitutionally based" then yes, I agree.

Wtf? Couldn't he just get some bondage movies on a free porn site?

Fair trial, then shoot him. I know what he did is fucking sick, but our society is based on due process, so he deserves a trial (it's either that or no one does). I'm sorry, but I don't understand the point of any other course of action. A sick bastard like this can't be rehabilitated, he's only a threat to society, so I think the best course of action is just to guarantee that he doesn't have the chance to harm anyone.

Beldaran wrote:If by "fucked up" you mean "constitutionally based" then yes, I agree.

Thanks, couldn't think of the word I wanted to use so I just used something else.

This guy...is just fucking sick...

They oughta dunk him and see how he likes it. I hope he gets locked away for life with Big Brutus as his cell mate. I'm against the death penalty and all, but if the inmates decide to take matters into their own hands...I won't mind one bit. Heck, I won't even mind if they decide to kill him straight out.

I can't believe someone would actually do this...you just can't DUNK a kid, and think that taking them out unconsious will do anything good. If you fall unconsious underwater like that, odd are your lungs are full of water, and you are fucked.

It's just...SICK!

>_> I apologize if I seem to be using the F-bomb more frequentlyt than I usually do, but...this guy needs to be removed from society, one way or another.

rock_nog wrote:A sick bastard like this can't be rehabilitated

I think it's pretty unfair to say this. I'm gonna go out on a limb here and assume that you've never met this guy, and that you have no evidence to suggest that he's made any attempt at rehabilitation that could call into question his ability to be rehabilitated at all.

Yes, he seems to be a sicko, but sickos are people, and people can change for the better.

Riverman makes good points. Also, I think it's disrespectful of murder victims to say a murderer can be rehabilitated because his crime is not as bad as a child sexual fetish thing. If a murderer can be rehabilitated, as liberal minded people would have us believe, they must apply the same standard to other deviations from societal norms.

I think it's sad that we just sort of glaze over when we hear about theft and murder, but we get all indignant when someone has a sexual disorder.

But but... he thought he was actually going to go meet up with someone that would let him do his "sick dirty deeds" with her children. He's TOO stupid for humanity... and definately should NOT be allowed to breed and propagate.

He should be held accountable for his intentions and receive more then just a slap on the wrist and a few days in jail.

Prrkitty wrote:
He should be held accountable for his intentions and receive more then just a slap on the wrist and a few days in jail.

I completely agree. 100%. I'm just pointing out that I wish the same vehemence was held towards other crimes.

Beldaran wrote:I think it's sad that we just sort of glaze over when we hear about theft and murder, but we get all indignant when someone has a sexual disorder.

I'll be honest. I can't stand murder. It pisses me off just as much as rape does. But even as I can't stand murder, I can't stand the death penalty, even if the person more than well deserves it. No one has the right to end a human life. I don't care what religion or belief you follow, its not right by my book. Lock the guy up and let him rot for the rest of his life in isolation, but no one has the right to say that his life should be forfeit.

Funny coming from someone trained to kill huh? I don't quite get it myself.

Beldaran wrote:Riverman makes good points. Also, I think it's disrespectful of murder victims to say a murderer can be rehabilitated because his crime is not as bad as a child sexual fetish thing. If a murderer can be rehabilitated, as liberal minded people would have us believe, they must apply the same standard to other deviations from societal norms.

I think it's sad that we just sort of glaze over when we hear about theft and murder, but we get all indignant when someone has a sexual disorder.

Don't get me wrong, I have no problem with the concept of rehabilitation. It's just that's not what prison is, and we shouldn't pretend that it is. It's a place people go to be punished. Very few people come out of prison better off than they were when they were sent there. Seriously, our current penal system is a joke. We don't even really have a consensus on what we think it should be used for. One way or the other, I think we should really decide, because right now, I can't see how it serves any potential purpose, other than keeping dangerous life-sentence criminals away from the public.

EDIT: Oh, and how is locking someone away forever any different than killing them? It's the same result, ultimately. Their life is, in fact, forfeit, as far as I can tell.

Even if they are rehabilitated, do you want to take the chance to put them back into society?

rock_nog wrote:
EDIT: Oh, and how is locking someone away forever any different than killing them? It's the same result, ultimately. Their life is, in fact, forfeit, as far as I can tell.

I have often made this point to anti-death penalty people and they just glaze over. Too much logic.

That is a good point that I had not really taken into consideration myself. I guess by living life in prison, you just don't get anything out of life and you might as well be dead. It is something to think over I guess.

We could always section off a city with a bad crime rate, say New York or L.A. and just send all rapists and murderers there. I don't see anything wrong with that. I mean, the president wouldn't crash land there if he flew over it or anything.

Don't send murderers and rapists to my city. LA and NY have some of the lowest crime rates in the nation for big cities.

I've heard that life in prison is cheaper than the death penalty because it requires less court cases.

Also, if you mistakenly convict someone, you can let them out of jail when new evidence surfaces. If you kill them, well, then damage done.

That's why Illinois put a moratorium on the death penalty. They found that a good percentage of people had been put to death who were innocent.

phattonez wrote:Don't send murderers and rapists to my city. LA and NY have some of the lowest crime rates in the nation for big cities.

I've heard that life in prison is cheaper than the death penalty because it requires less court cases.

I was making a really bad Snake Plisskin joke.

hehe those movies were crazy.

I noticed that no one has addressed the fact that this person wasn't actually going to dunk any kids. The kids didn't exist. The man was TRICKED by the same people who are now going to sentence him.

It's unlikely this crime would have ever occurred, as I find it highly unlikely that one would happen across a mother who would willingly sell her children to be drowned. Only an undercover agent dealing with imaginary children would do such a thing.

Nowadays, it's like INTENT is just as bad as the actual ACTION. It reminds me of Minority Report, where you don't have to do anything to be prosecuted, you just have to be "going to do something".

This man wasn't going to drown any kids. Don't any of you dare tell me that he was. There were no kids to drown, so he wasn't going to. This was a fantasy situation, and shouldn't be carried over to real life.

Undercover agents should be ashamed. They just troll chatrooms trying to trick people so they can jail them. It's so malicious.

let's be honest, who hasn't wanted to drown some kids?

Anthony wrote:We could always section off a city with a bad crime rate, say New York or L.A. and just send all rapists and murderers there. I don't see anything wrong with that. I mean, the president wouldn't crash land there if he flew over it or anything.

Beldaran wrote:let's be honest, who hasn't wanted to drown some kids?

Well, gee, Bel, now that you mention it, yeah, I've always wanted to drwait a second! You sneaky undercover bastard.

If someone asked to buy my child so he could drown them and get off on it...

I'd go to jail for murder, because I'd hunt the sick son-of-a-bitch down and shoot him in the face. No questions asked.

Sorry, I loathe those who prey on innocent children.