Read-only archive of the Armageddon Games Forums Archive (2000–2026) · About this archive

Porn For Bibles

66 replies · 10,528 views · Started 12 July 2007

Bel: I am right.
Atma: I am right.
Bel: You're stupid, I'm right.
Atma: You don't read, I'm right.

This is never going to end so it's really pretty pointless.

I think there a few catagories of people that generally present themselves in arguements like these. I make no attempt to say what anyone of you is.

First, you have the people that believe that God is all, that science is a bunch of gunk put out to fool people.

Secondly, you have those people that think science is the shit and believing in God is believing in magic and makes you a whacko.

And finally, you've got those that believe in science and God. Somehow they've made thier belief with God mesh with sceince, or maybe thier even okay with having two conflicting points of views.

The main point is, religous arguements are really quite stupid no matter what side you are on. It is impossible to persuade someone to your point of view unless that person wants to be persuaded.

No matter what your viewpoint is, why does it matter so much what the other persons views are? If you believe that faith in God is faith in magic that's great for you, but why attack those that believe in God? Does having faith really mean that those people can't be scientist?

On the flip side of that, so what if someone doesn't believe in God? Don't bother trying to disprove scientific theories through pseudo-science. If you believe that scientist are going to hell for what they believe, talk to them about God as the bible says, if they don't take up the faith, say a prayer for them not to go to hell if that's what you believe.

Basically, the problem with religous arguements like this is that they aren't debates like you'd find in a high school class. They are highly emotional arguements because niether side is content with merely presenting thier views on things, and the reasons they find the opposing views wrong. No both sides have a desire to prove their side RIGHT and the other WRONG.

phattonez wrote:Bel: I am right.
Atma: I am right.
Bel: You're stupid, I'm right.
Atma: You don't read, I'm right.

This is never going to end so it's really pretty pointless.

I am the snake head eating the head of the opposite side

dude, seriously, I can't believe we haven't grown out of debating things with stupid red faces held up to the screen, screaming, wishing some nub at AGN could hear your fury.

Athiests are retards. You cannot disprove god. Not yet, and probobly not ever. But for sure you can't now. We just aren't smart enough.

Christians are retards. There is no proof of a god.
I personally believe there probobly is a higher entity who created us for some reason.

I always thought agnosticism was pussy, but when you really think about it, your a pigheaded jackass if you disagree with it. All good christians are agnostic. All good athiests are agnostic. You can't know for sure there is a god. Faith is for queers - you can't blindly follow something based on absolutely no factual evidence. I'm sorry but there is none.

There is some commanding speculation, but no real evidence.

And the same holds true for lack of a god, except that is a hundred times less concrete than the existance of one. Once again, explain everthing ever ever before you argue something as trivial as the existance of higher power.
Neither of you know.

also, I haven't done anything except briefly looked at the arguement, so if I'm off on what I'm saying, eat your own fucking face.

punkonjunk1024 wrote:Athiests are retards. You cannot disprove god. Not yet, and probobly not ever. But for sure you can't now. We just aren't smart enough.

Christians are retards. There is no proof of a god.
I personally believe there probobly is a higher entity who created us for some reason.

Bel is going to jump all over you for that. You shouldn't be Atheist because there is no evidence disproving God? That argument holds is worthless.

Can we at least stop calling each oter retards? If you're going to have a pointless debate you could at least be civil.

Guys I just realized basically Beldaran has been calling me a witch all this time. I'm goin chill with the House Slypenslyde crew see you later!

This is done. If you wanna debate go revive the old thread or start a new one in think tank. Bel posted his link and said his words and now it's an all out brawl.

Closed.