Read-only archive of the Armageddon Games Forums Archive (2000–2026) · About this archive

So...

7457 replies · 1,886,047 views · Started 21 May 2007

1% or 2% is good for the bones. Young children (under 15) should drink whole milk... their bones need it. After 15... the lower fat milk will do just as good.

Dann Woolf wrote:First of all, 4chan's not that bad a place. It's just /b/ that you need to avoid like the plague.

Second, /b/ is the "random" board on 4chan, and this is a random topic. I couldn't help making the connection.

Just for the heck of it, I went on the 4chan forums, clicked around a little, washed my eyeballs, and turned back.

If anyone has an ounce of decency, take my warning: Never visit that site. Ever.

O...kay...
Yeah, we may be random, but at least when we decide on a random topic we stick with it for 5-10 posts and try to have (somewhat) meaningful discussion.
That site is just...stupid.

Prrkitty wrote:1% or 2% is good for the bones. Young children (under 15) should drink whole milk... their bones need it. After 15... the lower fat milk will do just as good.

Hmm, I never knew that. I've always been used to 2%. It's too bad that kids these days just hate milk completely.

I drink 2% white milk every day at school. A lot of people head straight for the chocolate/strawberry/vanilla milk, unfortunately. (Even though a flavored milk is good every once in a while.)

Yes, definitely nothing wrong with strawberry milk.

Vanilla milk? That really exists? Doesn't it just taste like regular milk?

No, it tastes like melted vanilla ice cream, actually. For a more accurate description, it tastes like white milk with vanilla flavoring. 😛 It's pretty good, but it gets sickening if you drink it more than two days in a row (like I used to a few years ago).

There are these ice blended drinks we can get on campus with our meal plan that aren't that bad. There's one called pure vanilla that I imagine tastes somewhat like you described, Pineconn, although a lot more surgary. It's weird because it seems light but it's full of sugar and you feel like crap after finishing one 😛

Yeah, I used to take chocolate all the time, but recently I've switched to 2% because I'm sick of chocolate.
Plus at our school, (maybe at others, I dunno) you get Milk and a Juice cup. The apple stuff is corn syrup in a container, but the orange is actually pretty good.

phattonez wrote:Typical post on /b/. "YOU RAFF U RUSE. HAHAHA!"

Typical post on So... "Milk is disgusting. Seriously."

/b/

There's the problem. Don't fucking judge all of 4chan by /b/. That's like judging all the cooks in the world by the single worst chef of all time.

Sure, there are trolls and underaged morons on other parts of the site, but you can't tell me that's something unique to 4chan.

phattonez wrote:Well it is the most popular part of that website . . .

So you're the kind of guy who judges the whole thing by the biggest part, and calls it a day?

Try visiting other parts of 4chan. Not every board fails as hard as /b/ does.

Oh, and why are you calling it "that website"? Saying "4chan" won't hurt, y'know.

:P I mostly have regular milk (A cup and a half every day at breakfast)

But when I visit my grandma she likes to make strawberry milk for me and my brother ( I don't like strawberries, but the milk is good, for some reason.) (oh, and she's recently started to give me tea with an unhealthy amount of sugar in it 😮 )

I really like chocolate milk, buuut....>_> When I have couble chocolate muffins 5 days of the week...uh...that's too much chocolate already. Adding chocolate milk would make it impossible to take a dump.

It's probably because those aren't real strawberries in chocolate milk. It's pretty much straight sugar.

phattonez wrote:I'm calling it "that website" because everybody knows what we're talking about. No need to reiterate.

Let's flip this bitch around.

In a discussion about you, would you be OK with everyone referring to you as "that guy"? I mean, everyone would know it's you they're talking about, no need to reiterate, right?

If you're going to talk about something, refer to it by its name. That's just the done thing.

I still say you're taking this way too seriously. I'm a person, a website is a thing. There is a huge difference. And if I'm not present, then sure, call me that guy, call me he, it only makes more sense.

Dann Woolf wrote:Let's flip this bitch around.

In a discussion about you, would you be OK with everyone referring to you as "that guy"? I mean, everyone would know it's you they're talking about, no need to reiterate, right?

If you're going to talk about something, refer to it by its name. That's just the done thing.

From now on, my name for you is "that guy."

...lol...

On friday, I had some super buttered popcorn made from one of those old school popcorn machines on wheels.

:P as I scarfed down the delishous snack, I said "mmm...fat content..."

...And my friend next to me thought I was talking about this girl on an Anime Club poster, for some reason...

Dann Woolf wrote:So you're the kind of guy who judges the whole thing by the biggest part, and calls it a day?

Try visiting other parts of 4chan. Not every board fails as hard as /b/ does.

Oh, and why are you calling it "that website"? Saying "4chan" won't hurt, y'know.

Welcome to another edition of "unnecessarily pissed off guy easily offended at perceived insults to someone or something else".

Tune in tomorrow when he will undoubtedly swear at me for poking fun at the ridiculous nature of his previous post.