Read-only archive of the Armageddon Games Forums Archive (2000–2026) · About this archive
Armageddon Games Forums Archive

Hot pics of a young blond girl (no nudity, but nsfw)

45 replies · 8,148 views · Started 11 March 2007

The_Amaster 11 Mar 2007, 18:44

Oh, yeah, I've seen that on TV a couple times.

You know, how come even though all underage sex is illegal, we only persecute the adults who go after minors, and not sex between two minors?

For that matter, the sex between an older man and a younger woman is often consensual. How come the girl gets off?

And the women out there who like young boys, we don't seem to do anything about them.

It's all older, oppressive, bigoted men going after poor, young, oppressed helpless innocent young girls.

Gunslinger 11 Mar 2007, 19:05

Amaster42 wrote:For that matter, the sex between an older man and a younger woman is often consensual. How come the girl gets off?

She'll only get off if the man lets her.

Amaster42 wrote:
And the women out there who like young boys, we don't seem to do anything about them.

Where were all the sexed up older women when I was a teenager?

Prrkitty 11 Mar 2007, 21:09

As quoted from wiki about Chris Hansen: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Hansen

----------
"There is a popular prank making its rounds around the internet. The "Chris Hansen Prank" has made its way thru message boards, MySpace profiles, e-mails and various other websites. The prank has a link such as, click here for nude photos of a young girl, then the link takes you to a photo of Chris Hansen and a recording of his voice saying, "Why don't you have a seat over there" or "My name is Chris Hansen, and I am with Dateline NBC"."
---------------

I wonder if Chris Hansen realizes that from now on when his name is mentioned it will forever be identified with his pedophile shows?

Glenn the Great 11 Mar 2007, 21:56

Amaster42 wrote:Oh, yeah, I've seen that on TV a couple times.

You know, how come even though all underage sex is illegal, we only persecute the adults who go after minors, and not sex between two minors?

Our justice system is designed to be lenient on minors.


For that matter, the sex between an older man and a younger woman is often consensual. How come the girl gets off?

According to law, it is never consensual. Age of consent laws state that until a person is of a certain age (often 16, but varies by state/jurisdiction), they are legally unable to give consent to sexual relations. Such relations are treated as if the young one did not give consent (i.e. statutory rape.)


And the women out there who like young boys, we don't seem to do anything about them.

What about the highly publicized story of Mary Kay Letourneau?

The_Amaster 11 Mar 2007, 21:59

Age of consent laws state that until a person is of a certain age (often 16, but varies by state/jurisdiction), they are legally unable to give consent to sexual relations. Such relations are treated as if the young one did not give consent (i.e. statutory rape.)

That is amazingly stupid.

Glenn the Great 11 Mar 2007, 22:03

Amaster42 wrote:That is amazingly stupid.

The rationale is that until you reach that age, you are not mature enough to understand what you are getting into by agreeing to sexual relations.

The_Amaster 11 Mar 2007, 22:06

I say 12, maybe 14. After that, your mature enough to be held responsible for your own actions and many boys and girls have already had sex anyway.

Glenn the Great 11 Mar 2007, 22:13

Amaster42 wrote:I say 12, maybe 14. After that, your mature enough to be held responsible for your own actions and many boys and girls have already had sex anyway.

You yourself are under the age of consent, and this is how you feel. That is exactly how the girls under the age of consent are expected to feel when they give consent. In my personal opinion from seeing some of your posts on these forums, you have some more years of learning and experience ahead of you before you should try to rule on such matters.

Also, I feel that the premise of this thread is flawed. I thought I might find pictures of an 18 year old blonde girl (which would easily be considered "young"😉, to get greeted by a picture accusing me of being a predator. It doesn't make sense.

The_Amaster 11 Mar 2007, 22:33

Wait..so because I lack these years of learning, I believe people should be held accountable for their own actions?

I agree with you on your second point, tho.
Gunslinger, if you wanted to catch predators, you may have wanted to hint more at it being an underage girl in the thread topic. Although like I said, I assumed from the topic that it was a spam-bot of some kind.

Gunslinger 11 Mar 2007, 22:40

Glenn the Great wrote:Also, I feel that the premise of this thread is flawed. I thought I might find pictures of an 18 year old blonde girl (which would easily be considered "young"😉, to get greeted by a picture accusing me of being a predator. It doesn't make sense.

You are being greeted by Chris Hansen and the words that he uses at the beginning of every interview with a sexual predator. There was nothing wrong with the execution of this thread.

Glenn the Great 11 Mar 2007, 23:14

But there is no reason to accuse me of being a predator.

And yes, Amaster. You aren't learned enough to realize that there are situations where people cannot be expected to be held accountable for their actions.

The_Amaster 12 Mar 2007, 00:35

I don't agree with you, but I have to admit I can't argue, as I don't have your experiance.

But this occured to me, if sex is non-consensual under 16, akin to rape, does that mean that two, say, 15 year olds are raping each other?

Glenn the Great 12 Mar 2007, 01:17

Amaster42 wrote:But this occured to me, if sex is non-consensual under 16, akin to rape, does that mean that two, say, 15 year olds are raping each other?

This is a reason these kids don't get prosecuted by the courts. The parents will be informed of the relations if they don't know already, and it is usually left to them to deal with it.

The_Amaster 12 Mar 2007, 01:23

Eh, I just don't think that it's fair for the man to be called a sex predator, labeled in a database for anyone to look at, and suffer prejeduce and suspicion for the rest of his life, while the girl just walks away, and possibly has loads of sympathy poured upon her after her "traumatic episode".

Glenn the Great 12 Mar 2007, 01:25

Amaster42 wrote:Eh, I just don't think that it's fair for the man to be called a sex predator, labeled in a database for anyone to look at, and suffer prejeduce and suspicion for the rest of his life, while the girl just walks away, and possibly has loads of sympathy poured upon her after her "traumatic episode".

That's why if you really care about the underage girl, you should mark her 16th birthday on your calendar and wait for it like a new Zelda game.

Lilith 12 Mar 2007, 01:37

Age of consent laws >16...not really getting the big deal on it. It's really easy to take advantage of kids, and before that (or after for that matter) you're basically a kid. You can make decisions, but they're often much stupider than the ones you make a few years later! Also, huge duh guys, getting pregnant at 14-16 is a whole different issue than getting pregnant when you're older.

The_Amaster 12 Mar 2007, 01:40

You can make decisions, but they're often much stupider than the ones you make a few years later!

*Snort* Not that I've noticed. Every day I see 20-30 somthings behaiving immature and stupid.(Mostly immature)

Lilith 12 Mar 2007, 01:49

Yeah, and they tend to have income/adult friends/resources enough to take responsibility for their actions. If you get a KID pregnant, you're pretty much ruining their life...

The_Amaster 12 Mar 2007, 01:53

they tend to have income/adult friends/resources enough to take responsibility for their actions.

Cause of course, kids dont have parents, or anything.

I'm not really arguing with you at this point, just pointing stuff out.

Lilith 12 Mar 2007, 02:39

looooool if you're really intent on sticking your dick in a bunch of 15 year-olds why don't you tell us how smoothly it goes

The_Amaster 12 Mar 2007, 02:47

My point is, teens are a lot smarter/young adults are a lot dumber than most people think. I'm not saying that a teenager is as rational or as smart as a capable, intelligent 35, or 40 year old, or even some 20 year olds, I'm just saying that 16, or 18, or 21 is not some magic intelligence and maturity milestone.

Glenn the Great 12 Mar 2007, 02:53

Amaster42 wrote:My point is, teens are a lot smarter/young adults are a lot dumber than most people think. I'm not saying that a teenager is as rational or as smart as a capable, intelligent 35, or 40 year old, or even some 20 year olds, I'm just saying that 16, or 18, or 21 is not some magic intelligence and maturity milestone.

It isn't a magic milestone, but it keeps the system objective. It isn't feasible to totally abolish age restrictions, and there isn't really any other practical way than to agree on a set age.

SUCCESSOR 12 Mar 2007, 04:43

The way I've heard that the "consent laws" work here (in NM) set the legal age of consent at twelve but only if there is no more than a 2 year difference in age. A 14 year old and and 16 year old going at it would be "experimenting"(sp?). Beyond that would be Statuatory Rape accusing the older "unbias" to gender. Also a 19 year old and a 17 year old, or an 18 year old and a 16 year old would be the same unless that older one held a position of authority such as an officer, teacher, or family member(parent, guardian, etc).

Below the age of twelve I'd imagine the rules change and are more relative to each situation.

This makes sence to me. Persecuting a person simply because their partner is under the age of consent when their age difference isn't even that great is ridiculous to me.