Sued for not giving orgasms

Unless she had a previously signed legally binding contract with the man to receive an orgasm, I fail to see where her case is.

[QUOTE=mitchbuck]She complained that her 38-year-old partner reached an orgasm and then simply stopped the sexual intercourse./QUOTE]

Sounds like something a man would do (at least, something the men I've been with, anyway). But I can't assume it was a man, as they don't say whether her partner was male or female.

I agree with Rainman on this one, she doesn't really have a case unless she somehow talked her partner into signing a contract saying s/he'd giver her an orgasm everytime they had intercourse. And for some reason, I don't think anyone in their right might would sign a contract like that. I mean, a female might if the male wanted it signed, but I think that'd the only way, lol.

EDIT: I am NOT going throught this again! You'll have to read my next post.

zoraking wrote:I think it be funny to get a woman to almost climax and quit there everytime, even if you didn't get off.

Yeah, for about two seconds, until she slits your throat with her suddenlyrazorsharp fingernails.

You don't fuck around what that, man.

Dechipher wrote:Yeah, for about two seconds, until she slits your throat with her suddenlyrazorsharp fingernails.

You don't fuck around what that, man.

It was a joke, ya! That's a good way to be hated by the female community.

Dechipher wrote:Yeah, for about two seconds, until she slits your throat with her suddenlyrazorsharp fingernails.

You don't fuck around what that, man.

Ananova is realiably fake news. GG though.

Maybe that explains the thread about that man with 372 bras. 🙄

EDIT: This headline is true! They justmentioned it on Weekend at the DL