Menokh wrote:And, if no one minds me saying so, you're cute, *b*.
yeah, he is a lil cutie, isn't he? although you'll probably have more luck seducing him than i will :evil:
Menokh wrote:And, if no one minds me saying so, you're cute, *b*.
yeah, he is a lil cutie, isn't he? although you'll probably have more luck seducing him than i will :evil:
cyberkitten wrote:yeah, he is a lil cutie, isn't he? although you'll probably have more luck seducing him than i will :evil:
You have a good point there... :evil:
*b* wrote:actually, it's a fallen tree, and my dad took the pic from belowI'm so sorry about your loss but I hear they have new medicines that can save even the most withered "tree". 😊
Lilith: OK complying with your request tonight
*edit*
PS
Do you like me?
[ ] yes
[ ] no
[ ] maybe
Atma, dude, you need to lay low for another month. She's still considered panty-laden jail bait at a lush young 17. Don't want me calling the cops on you. 😉
On a completely unrelated note, my post count is now 4321. :thumbsup:
EDIT #2:

Oh yeah... :laughing:
omg, that's great, JJ. I love you.
So *b*, what are you doin' later? :naughty:
In Sweet Home Mississippi she could possibly be fair game. Statutory rape is defined as follows:
What's funny though is fondling carries a 24-month limit, so you can have sex with someone but cannot legally touch them.
I'd do the calculations to determine if she was in the 36-month window but [list=1][*]See below paragraphs[*]In Mississippi they didn't teach us math just goats[/list]
I know this because the assistant DA gave us a 3 hour lecture in high school about it and we destroyed his speech because the weird kid that liked to stab himself with pencils asked about bestiality and really tripped him up. Then we got into whether it counted on international waters and he informed us that on a boat on international waters the captain counts as a judge and can have you executed legally :scared:.
But if the question is over whether the images are illicit or not that depends, because I'm pretty sure Congress passed a bill recently that for some reason makes depictions of nude minors acceptable if it is not sexual in nature (??? WTF ???) no I don't understand it either. Anyway there are 9-year-olds in the Sears catalog in bathing suits which are basically bras and panties, plus many non-nude sites loudly proclaim their models are 17 and younger so I don't think underwear counts unless there is some exploitation going on.
Oh and by the way I AM TRYING TO HAVE FUN MAKING JOKES OK even though Lilith is an attractive female I have a girl of my own and I don't have the time to maintain an online girlfriend, particularly one that is not interested in me. It is all I can do to keep this one girlfriend who is now 460 miles away so I really don't hate myself enough to try for 2. I just thought that since this is a forum visited primarily by sexually deprived teenage males my playful advances would get a chuckle or two. I also hoped that if my antics were ridiculous enough and I claimed I'd bother Lilith enough then maybe the members who I knew were going to do it would decide to watch and see if I had success, and when I didn't post a victory they would assume she wasn't giving out more. I apologize, Lilith, and take back everything I said but I'm pretty sure at least you got the joke. I will not make any more jokes about you without a disclaimer from now on so no one gets confused. I do need to send you a PM about member pages business, it will not have any clever jokes in it just business.
I'M SORRY I FAGGED UP YOUR THREAD WARLORD I DIDN'T MEAN TO 😞 I POSTED
AtmaWeapon wrote: If you have fresh info, PM it to me, I don't really want to hijack WL's thread into a Member Pages thread, we have one already.SO I REALLY TRIED :cry::cry:
J.J. Maxx wrote:
Oh yeah... :laughing:
damn you J.J., I'm going to have nightmares for weeks
oh, and just 6 more months, people 😉
Holy shit, Atma, grab some Valium or something; I don't see anybody here who's confused or "didn't get the joke..."
Atma. Xanax. Now.
There's one other pic. And I'm engaged.
OK actually I have a better solution that does not involve mind-altering drugs: sleep. Somehow last night when I read J.J.'s thread my sleep deprivation hid the 😉 from my eyes and somehow I became too caught up in the joke and decided to act like I had something to defend. I then don't really know what happened because at this point of the night I was watching something like 8 threads and I think I overloaded myself, which tainted my judgement, with horrible results. Looking back it wasn't even that good of a joke and I should have let it die by ignoring it rather than trying to revive it. Alas, I am in a continuous process of learning, and this has been a lesson.
I'm still sorry I fagged up Warlord's thread and I'm really hoping J.J. sees this before posting because I'm sorry to him because I misread his post. It's all a big misunderstanding. I told myself that the joke wouldn't last more than one post but I went against my judgement and tried to drag it out. I was kind of frustrated last night because I didn't really meet any of my goals and I had a few important things to do.
So I apologize to all parties involved and maybe in the future I will have better judgement. I keep repeating myself but there was some direction I wanted to go in and I keep forgetting what it is. Man I'm going to be glad for the 2-week break I'm about to get between work and school.
On a side note I noticed that if you do the n right, "xanax" is a palindrome, symmetric, and looks the same in a mirror.
You need to go back to bed, homie.
Well, heck, if any of you care to know what I look like, I suppose I could post up my only pics...
Anyway, these are my senior pics, taken a little over a year ago. I look exactly the same now, only my lip is now sporting the bald look, rather than the "I'm-too-lazy-to-shave" look. View at your own risk.
Oh ya! That's what you lok like huh? I've never seen someone have his avatar as his picture, how did you get custom avatar with only 80 posts? ...... wait what are those links at the bottom? Ooooooooh.. THATS what you look like... so is your avatar a picture of your brother?
or the mushrooms you eat?
skidphyzz wrote:Oh ya! That's what you lok like huh? I've never seen someone have his avatar as his picture, how did you get custom avatar with only 80 posts? ...... wait what are those links at the bottom? Ooooooooh.. THATS what you look like... so is your avatar a picture of your brother?or the mushrooms you eat?
No, it's a Goomba in disguise. It's from a web comic called Force Monkeys, which has sadly closed it's doors. And I don't know how I got a custom avatar other than the fact that I went to the control panel and uploaded one. 😃
EDIT: The link to the exact comic is here. It's much funnier in the context of the joke, not that a goomba in groucho glasses isn't hillarious enough in the first place.
AtmaWeapon wrote:So I apologize to all parties involved and maybe in the future I will have better judgement.
no need to apologize, to me anyway, I got a kick out of it 😃
Hrm... I... uh... I think I killed this thread. This always happens. Crikey!
The first one I posted a while back
The second one...
A third, newer one, from last August
Why do people only take pictures of me when I'm holding babies? And why do they seem to not get my face in the picture most of the time?
Heh, I'm curious... why is the baby's face removed in those first two? Perhaps it's entered the witness protection program...? :tongue:
Nothing wrong with babies being in the picture, Jen. I for one like sight of a girl holding an infant. Even if it's not directly reflecting them personally, I like girls with a maternal instinct.
Well... I didn't want to show someone else's face on the internet for everyone to see without their approval... and since she's 2 right now... *shrugs*
the best picture i could get is the one of my balls on Glenns Face
{DSG}DarkRaven wrote:Nothing wrong with babies being in the picture, Jen. I for one like sight of a girl holding an infant. Even if it's not directly reflecting them personally, I like girls with a maternal instinct.
:laughing:
I'm not gonna say anything.
fatcatfan wrote::laughing:
I'm not gonna say anything.
{DSG}DarkRaven wrote:Nothing wrong with babies being in the picture, Jen. I for one like sight of a girl holding an infant. Even if it's not directly reflecting them personally, I like girls with a maternal instinct.
You haven't been here long, have you?
I'll let Jen explain anything to you that... Jen feels the need to explain. 😃
<3 Jen 😊
Well considering Jenny doesn't blab the answer everywhere, you'd be surprised of how many people would miss the fact if they aren''t here frequently(or in 1999+).😊 Jennifer should put that fact in the custom title like DT.😛
Jennifer, I thought this was you.
ROFL You did? Damn.:laughing: Didn't Jennifer joke about that? That was an old picture, I think I saw it in an old textbook or something.😛
Blonde799 wrote:ROFL You did? Damn.:laughing: Didn't Jennifer joke about that? That was an old picture, I think I saw it in an old textbook or something.😛ICH is clearly being sarcastic. :thumbsup:
moocow wrote:You haven't been here long, have you?I'll let Jen explain anything to you that... Jen feels the need to explain. 😃
<3 Jen 😊
You know, I'd figure that sort of thing might be obvious by my dubiously low post count, but for the sake of announcement, no, I haven't been here that long. Even less time on the general forums. I've spent most of my time thus far on the Zelda Classic section.
I would enjoy the explanation, if someone would care to give it. Considering the responses I've gotten, I'm curious as to what exactly I said to make a fool of myself. :tongue:
Jennifer is a young boy who, I believe, is pursuing a social change over to a female for reasons that I don't understand and never want to. He's practicing this transsexuality online right now, as you can tell.
"o" i dont have a pic but ok