Would you rather be totally free and have no security, totally secure and have no freedom. Or somewhere in the middle? :eyebrow: I'd like to be mostly free with enough security to protect me from most things that would seriously harm me.
Freedom Vs. Security
I say mostly free with some security because i dont like people tellin me what to do but i dont want to have to look over my shoulder every 5 seconds.
I want to be totally free with no security. I don't need no big brother wana be on my back. :meanie:
There's something wrong with a person if they can't watch there own back.
I don't need cops telling me how fast I can drive, and Microsoft/Hollywood/Disney telling me what I can have and not have on my PC. :angry: I don't like it here or there. I don't like it anywhere. :reading:
I hate authority. 😡
Freedom and security. You can have both with Linux 😉 And for the low cost of $0.00
being secure doesn't always mean you can't be free.
Originally posted by Paradox
being secure doesn't always mean you can't be free.
Thats completely true and I agree. You dont need to sacrifice freedom for security
I'd rather be totally free without security......
I dont really like people protecting me it just makes me feel wierd 😕
*Sugar*
Security is good to have as long as it doesn't disrupt freedom.
yeah i agree.....
but too much security bothers me
*Sugar*
I chose option number two.. We should be all paranoid and lock ourselves in but we shouldnt act like we dont give a damn...