User Tag List

Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Building the source

  1. #1
    Administrator DarkDragon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    6,228
    Mentioned
    70 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    vBActivity - Stats
    Points
    11,048
    Level
    31
    vBActivity - Bars
    Lv. Percent
    10.8%

    Building the source

    Should I be building 2.50.x or master (I'm still not clear on the difference? master is a rewrite-in-progress, if I understand correctly?)

    Are there instructions somewhere on the dependencies needed to build the source?

    I see an MSVC2008 project file; are there project files for MSVC2010 or 2015/16? Are there any plans to deprecate 2008 support and switch to 64-bit C++11?

    I see some discussion on GitHub about switching to CMake. That sounds like a good idea -- what is the current status of this?

    Sorry for all of the noob questions -- I've been out of the loop for a while. Feel free to just point me to a FAQ to read if my questions are answered there.

  2. #2
    The Timelord
    QDB Manager
    ZC Developer

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Prydon Academy
    Posts
    1,396
    Mentioned
    112 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    vBActivity - Stats
    Points
    4,782
    Level
    21
    vBActivity - Bars
    Lv. Percent
    73.24%
    2.50.x is probably what you want for now. The 'master' branch is the WIP toward 2.54/2.55. I'm pretty sure that some of the additions in 'master' won't compile as-is. The global symbols table for ffscript is incomplete, and some functions are also incomplete. Even if it compiles, it might just crash outright, or if you try to do anything related to the new bitmap usage.


    The 'master' branch is not yet the rewrite though. It just has a bunch of new drawing functions, expanded use of bitmaps for the user, and some general cleanup. Both have some AS hooks, but I don't think anything uses them. All the AS npc-script code that Saffith was working on was purged at one point. As I recall, it had severe performance issues, or something like that.

    ---

    There are no project files for VS versions newer than 2010, and IDK if the 2010 files work properly. I'm pretty sure that 64 bit c++11 would have issues, and I know with certainty that Allegro won't compile on Linux using gcc on/for 64 bit architecture.

    I still want/need/have to update Allegro to the absolute latest v4 build. I think it's v4.4.2.

  3. #3
    The Time-Loop Continues ZC Developer
    Gleeok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,827
    Mentioned
    259 Post(s)
    Tagged
    10 Thread(s)
    vBActivity - Stats
    Points
    12,979
    Level
    33
    vBActivity - Bars
    Lv. Percent
    28.41%
    I only work with the trunk and haven't built the 2.50 code in over a year. From the other thread it sounds like 2.50 has the wrong project files in it.

    And yes, I use VS 2008 because it is the last VC++ version that doesn't suck, and also because I'm one of those guys that thinks c++11/14 is a big steaming pile of garbage (Yes, we do exist!). ..(Also doesn't help that my comp with 2013 died [motherboard], and half the keys on my win10 laptop don't work. )
    This post contains the official Gleeok seal of approval. Look for these and other posts in an area near you.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About us
Armageddon Games is a game development group founded in 1997. We are extremely passionate about our work and our inspirations are mostly drawn from games of the 8-bit and 16-bit era.
Social