Well for starters, entrants cannot also judge because there would be bias. Secondly, how would you like to play through 10 full length quests in a limited amount of time? If the time restraints on the 4th contest weren't so tight we would've seen 8 entries for that, and even with the 6 that made it, real life issues crept up on half of those responsible for judging the thing, with a few dropping out entirely. This led to the longest "waiting for a result" period only trumped by Duke Nukem Forever. On top of that some of the quests were so close, each in a different way, it was very difficult to decide. I'm just trying to not repeat past mistakes here.
Plus, isn't there the matter of possibly organizing a community quest in the future?
...Wait, weren't you one of the people that suggested a similar voting method in chat?
lol. The "no" is mostly useless anyway. :tongue2: You are not obligated either way.