I thought Brain Age and Nintendogs were pretty cool, but now seeing all the crap that followed suit, I sort of wish they'd never came out.
I thought Brain Age and Nintendogs were pretty cool, but now seeing all the crap that followed suit, I sort of wish they'd never came out.
I doubt Nintendo would bother making a true FPS because:
a) The people in charge of Nintendo aren't really interested in making stuff with graphic violence. Though I wonder, does a FPS *need* graphic violence to be enjoyable?
b) Nintendo doesn't have to actually make the game itself if it's able to secure another developer to do the work instead. Unless I'm mistaken, isn't Mario Party actually done by Hudson, and not Nintendo? Why bother competing with developers when you can just license their work instead and make more money that way?
Current status: Former College student / Former Intern for Hardcore Gamer Magazine
----------------------------
Teh Winnar of the second Annual Writing Contest!
Didn't my man Shiggy M. once say that he could've made Halo?
You can take the nerd out of 4chan, but you can't take 4chan out of the nerd.
Yes there was a bit about that, but you have to remember people often miss their translation and blow it out of proportion. I think in the end, what he was really saying was there was no reason he couldn't have made a game like Halo, but he had no interest in doing so, or something like that. Just like how the MGS creator kept getting translated wrong and being these big headlines that seemed like he was slapping Sony across the face with his giant cock.
Ofcourse it was all bullshit, he said something that got translated wrong and then taken out of context even further.
if nintendo made halo 3... in reality, they try to find their own way of fun. they get their ideas from varous stuff. like zelda classic was inspired by mr.miymato's child hood. get the picture?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)