How about a nonuse rule?

[Cyclone]

Paradox, you ought to be ashamed. How dare you dig up a topic from before I even joined these then-fledgling forums. You shall suffer my enduring wrath.

Sends a horrific likeness of himself to plague Paradox's city.

Cyclone

[Cloral]

As I recall, this idea was shot down by WarLord. He said that the space gained by doing such would amount to about the space taken by perhaps 1 thread. This wouldn't justify the time and potential hassle it would take.

[Breaker]

Originally posted by Executioner of Deities


Thats actually a pretty good idea, i think. But the chances of it actually being implemented are pretty slim. After being a dictator aristocracy for so long, the staff would probably have a hard time dealing with the extra amount of time it takes to ban someone or to delete a username. See, now its just a few simple clicks and your done. But with that kind of system a simple ban could be drawn out for a whole week. Its really not effective enough, i think, to satisfy agn's needs. The staff is too large for that. Maybe if there was like a ban committee of a few select mods who've been around a long while and know everybody and most of what goes on around here. Like 4 or 5 of them, that could be the ban/user erase committee. Then if a mod whos not on the committee thinks a person should be banned, report to the committee then....wait...what do mods do? They ban people when people fuck up. So...having an aristocracy inside an aristocracy isnt really necessary..is it? maybe its not such a good idea...

What is it you think we do? Every moderator for himself? If anybody ever questions on a member being banned or not, the staff as a whole may discuss it first.