Originally Posted by mighty_darknut
You know, you can change the amount of posts a page can view at the bottom right corner, so for some people this is NOT the newest page. Which is how it's just spam announcing something like that.
You know, you can change the amount of posts a page can view at the bottom right corner, so for some people this is NOT the newest page. Which is how it's just spam announcing something like that.
Somebody draw me a world to live in. Just one condition. It has to have robots as hobos so I can eat my ham sandwhich.
Live forever or die trying.
Don't ruin good things with good things.
Scars > Tatoos
Hmm, robot hobos, eh?
*goes off to scribble on his diabolical drawing board*
Happy Birthday, Beldaran! Assuming it is indeed your birthday. May it be a grand one indeed. ^^,
Thanks ST =)
Yeah, it's really my birthday. Ho Hum. Gotta do nothing but homework today.
What we have here is an ad hominem attack. Rather than arguing against the material I post, you attack my religion. A very childish thing to do.
Anyways, everybody keeps saying I've been misinformed, and that my source was too biased. Has it ever occured to you that maybe your sources were biased too?
Yeah, devices that measure brain activity are so biased.
I'm not "attacking your religion". I'm pointing out that you tend take strangers at their word with no evidence, and therefore have no intellectual credibility.
Obviously, it's possible, but let's see what our sources are. We've got diagnosis of PVS from a team of medical doctors. We've got a court ruling based on said diagnosis. And we've got an autopsy which supported the earlier medical diagnosis. What reason do I have to believe they were all deliberately manipulating the facts? Vs. one lawyer who was paid specifically to demonstrate that Terri Schiavo was alive. What reason do we have to take the lawyer's word, in the given circumstances? Why is his testimony so much more credible than everyone else's?
The artist formally known as macweirdo42, formally known as weirdguy (it's a long, uninteresting story).
...Okay, I swear, I'm getting, like, retroactive spam mail or something. Threaded backwards through time.
Seriously, I check my mail at 2:00, right. No new messages. I check it at 2:03, and I have one new message, a spam mail, received at 11:53. So it's been there for hours, it just wasn't there for hours a few minutes ago.
*insert twilight zone theme*
does it have cheese on it?
If you are caught by the gorillas, you must remember one thing.
What's that?
Never to speak!
What the hell would I have to say to a gorilla?
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
