Nintendo Revolution

[Axel]

most of the gun games I've seen are just target practice. Sometimes you get to be the gunner on a ship, other times you're a hunter. To make a good fps you'd need some other control, probably attatched to the gun, for character control.

[Darth Marsden]

Here's what I'd like to see on the Gamecube/Revolution (but will probably just end up getting for the PS1 or PS2):

Time Crisis 1/2/3/Crisis Zone/Project Titan
House of the Dead 1/2/3
Ninja Assault
Police 24/7
Virtua Cop 1/2/Elite
Area 51 (From the PS1, not the new FPS just released)
Point Blank 1/2/3
Lethal Enforcers 1/2
Gunfighter 1/2

...I could name more, but I'm bored and want to talk about something else now.

[Kapowie]

Having a good fps game with a light of preferably heavy gun would rock just imagine playiny halo 2 like that

EDIT: (Don't put tons of empty space in your post that causes excessive scroll) - Daark
just imagine playiny halo 2 like that

[Darth Marsden]

I'd love to, but I think the Halo series is boring and overrated. (Bear in mind that I don't play multiplayer).

Maybe it'll be some sort of virtual reality headset. Imagine playing Metroid Prime with THAT. It would kick ass and you know it.

Since this is the first time the thread has been updated in a while, I thought I'd shove this here: IGN's Revolution FAQ. Check out the rumors at the end - hilarious.

And finally - 200th post in this thread. I've never been prouder.

EDIT: Okay, 201st. Damn whoever beat me! DAMN THEM!

[Kitsune]

Ooh, the ability to download older games.. sounds like nintendo's making legal ROMs. XD

I may have not bought a gamecube, but I will definatly be buying this.

[Darth Marsden]

Another Nintendo convert! Huzzah!

[jessethe2nd]

Like Warlock said, actually college kids tend NOT to have alot of money. I hope PS3 does cost a ton. I want it to go down in flames. =)

By the way Warlock, NeoGeo actually, lasted all the way into the 2000s. Infact the last cartridges were probably produced in 2004. Just because you didn't notice it doesn't mean it went away.

Same here mottzilla. I personnaly think the console is just a more powerful version of the current system with crappy controllers

[Grasshopper]

I'd say most have read this on one site or another, but I'm going to go ahead and quote something from Gamespot...

"I'm aware that with all these technologies, the PS3 can't be offered at a price that's targeted towards households. I think everyone can still buy it if they wanted to," said Kutaragi to a mostly Japanese crowd. "But we're aiming for consumers throughout the world. So we're going to have to do our best [in containing the price]."

Then Kutaragi issued a somewhat ominous warning. "I'm not going to reveal its price today. I'm going to only say that it'll be expensive," he stated.

The rest of this article is here...
http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/07...s_6129611.html

[Darth Marsden]

Well shot in the foot. Yet another reason to stick with Nintendo, methinks.

Of course, this won't stop people from bying the console, but it may well make them take second thoughts if they have to pay $400-$500 for one.

[Cloral]

If the PS3 is $400+ and the 360 is $299 (which is where they hope to release it), we might really start to see a shift in power towards MS, since they're supposedly comperable in terms of power.