Method 1.
Printable View
Method 1.
I like the first method, it adds a little fun to the voting. Well, maybe not so much fun but more to do to feel like you actually did something. The only crucial part of this though is that that the results are hidden until it's time to reveal the winners. Plus if we do method 2, then there will be a whole lot more work to do for ST. I figure it should just be like a normal election. Every one gets to nominate 1 person for each award, then the top 10 most nominated go into a poll and people vote from there.
I say 'Method 1'
What about categories for 'most unusual/interesting' avatar/sig?
/my 2 cents worth
Method 1, but I think people should have to sign up in order to be included in the superlatives in place of nominations. (If not, I still say method 1 I guess...)
'I'm Not Reading That' Award: Longest posts
Simplicity Award: Shortest posts
Gerund Award: Best grammar
haha im teh 1337 Award: Worst grammar
Charity Award: Gives out the most reputation
'A Picture's Worth a Thousand Posts' Award: Posts the most pictures
Identity Crisis Award: Has had the most user names in the past
Weakest Link Award: Seems their posts/threads go unanswered the most (this may be difficult, or simply a bad superlative)
Faceless Award: Changes his/her avatar the most
Sniper Award: Verbally attacks other members the most (may be too similar to "Worst Temper")
Quarrelsome Award: Gets into the most flamed arguments (also may be similar to the above or to "Worst Temper")
Lincoln v. Douglas Award: Debates the most
Shigeru Miyamoto Award: Best Zelda Classic quest maker
Help Me Please! Award: Asks the most ZQuest/ZC questions
Some are okay, some aren't. If you keep any, feel free to pick a better title.
I vote for method 3, which basically entails dedicating this entire forum to discussing me and how great I am.
I like method 1, and second moocow's selection of awards.
I agree with DD... second mooie's topics and method #1.
I should be a major contender for the "LUBU Award".
I'll vote for ya Breaker...