-
This is great. There is nothing like someone who gets some sketchy "evidence" together and likes to think up "convincing" arguments based on this and thier "expert" knowledge of the pyshics of 747, large buildings, and metalurgy. Honestly you want to know what the real conspiracy is? Governments and groups do things to each other for one reason and good old George Carlin pointed it out, "What? They have bigger dicks than us? Bomb them! And for some reason all the missles and bombs are shaped liked dicks, that figures in there somehow."
-
Has this guy ever considered a career as a fiction writer? He has a really active imagination. He'd do very well with it. On the other hand, he'd make one lousy prosecuting attourney, and would probably earn the name Don Quixote by his fellow lawyers.
The theory itself isn't even worth commentary.
Although if it were me running the conspiracy, I would probably just hire some men to act as hijackers, and find them a way to get off the plane unnoticed before take off. Then I could remotely control the actual planes without worrying someone would see the switch. So what if people died in the act? Their bodies would be all the more evidence if any part survived.
Just some of my thoughts.
-
I find conspirocy theories really interesting, but I hardly ever believe them. I guess some truth could be found in them, but most of it is just someone with a creative mind linking a bunch of information and throwing it totally out of context. And most conspirocy theorists have never heard of the word 'coincidence'.