Great Warrior
07-01-2005, 07:09 AM
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/us/0506/gallery.wtc.designs/01.jpg
http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2005/US/06/29/wtc.tower.redesign/vert.nightview.jpg
http://www.cnn.com/video/player/player.html?url=/video/us/2005/06/29/vo.new.freedom.tower.affl&wm=10
What are your thoughts?
Why can't they just leave it alone? How many times was the last building set exposed to bombs and planes and other threats? It's just asking for trouble. I wouldn't be surprised if something happened to the next one they build if they do so. It's like the revolutionary war. The British walked around with bright red shirts and crossed trouser strips on their shirts to hold up their clothes etc. The new freedom tower will go down too if someone really wants it to and you're just putting up a big target or bullseye for someone to aim for. Not to mention, the tower they want to make it taller then ever.... I mean it's so tall that it's out of reach for the other buildings. You have a very clear shot at it and more margin for error available. Do people ever think?
http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2005/US/06/29/wtc.tower.redesign/vert.nightview.jpg
http://www.cnn.com/video/player/player.html?url=/video/us/2005/06/29/vo.new.freedom.tower.affl&wm=10
What are your thoughts?
Why can't they just leave it alone? How many times was the last building set exposed to bombs and planes and other threats? It's just asking for trouble. I wouldn't be surprised if something happened to the next one they build if they do so. It's like the revolutionary war. The British walked around with bright red shirts and crossed trouser strips on their shirts to hold up their clothes etc. The new freedom tower will go down too if someone really wants it to and you're just putting up a big target or bullseye for someone to aim for. Not to mention, the tower they want to make it taller then ever.... I mean it's so tall that it's out of reach for the other buildings. You have a very clear shot at it and more margin for error available. Do people ever think?