PDA

View Full Version : WMD



carrot red
07-08-2003, 03:52 AM
Ok, so they're making fun of us.
weapons of mass destruction (http://www.coxar.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/)

"And despite being five months old - a real veteran by Internet standards, the site is more popular than ever and is attracting over a million hits a week."
Read on. (http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=573&ncid=757&e=10&u=/nm/20030707/od_nm/wmd_dc)

Starkist
07-08-2003, 03:57 AM
Hehe, I think it's making fun of France even more than us. :)

carrot red
07-08-2003, 04:01 AM
Well, that's a relief.:shrug:

Gerudo
07-08-2003, 08:35 AM
how interesting... i first thought it was an actual error message.. :)

TheGeepster
07-10-2003, 06:55 PM
Hilarious stuff.. Wish I'd come on sometime in the last 5 days..

carrot red
07-10-2003, 07:20 PM
That's what happens when you go AWOL. You miss the walks in the park too.:tongue:

Pablo
07-10-2003, 10:20 PM
Seen it before, but it's still hilarious. Political humor is great, when done well. However, The Complete Military History of France (http://albinoblacksheep.com/text/france.html) is funnier, IMO.

Trevelyan_06
07-10-2003, 10:20 PM
Unfortunatly, this webpage has a good bit of truth behind. Good ol' George W. is having a hard time findin those weapons of mass destruction. Unless you count the million dollars found in a dog kennel or the porns found in his house with him in them.

Don't get me wrong I think that Saddam needed to be brought down. The man had many crimes agaisnt humanity but Busch needed to drop the WMD thing. I think Busch really wanted to take Saddam out because Busch's dad didn't get to do it. And know I think Busch has gotten himself deeper in the shit than he wanted. I believe he thought he could roll over Irag like we did in Desert Storm and be done with it. He forgot, however, that when you totally dismantle the governing system of a country you have to put something in it's place.

Master Ghaleon
07-10-2003, 10:28 PM
After I eat a big can of pork and beans my ass becomes a weapon of mass destruction :odd:

BTW - We really did need to bring Saddam down anyway cause you know he had something to do with 9/11.

TheGeepster
07-10-2003, 10:37 PM
If you could get an honest look at what we have and have not found, then I'm quite certain that their existence would seem fairly certain. But the American media largely seeks to damage Bush and his administration, in choosing not to report the small things in his favor and its focus on what's going wrong. In trying to spin everything in the worst light. The majority of the media isn't trusted by the American people like it used to be, and I believe it's for a reason.

That said, there's still a lot which remains to be done. Setting up a fair and equitable Iraqi government while rooting out remaining Baath remnants and trying to prevent other groups from establishing the same sort of tyrrany that Saddam had for two or three.

There's also that walk in the park. I hear it's sunny outside. ;)

Daarkseid
07-10-2003, 10:49 PM
Originally posted by Master Ghaleon

BTW - We really did need to bring Saddam down anyway cause you know he had something to do with 9/11.

Somehow, I really doubt this. Also, it seems more and more likely that Saddam had actually disposed of his WMDs, content instead to spend the last few years squandering the cash he had on those lavishly decadent palaces of his. Or perhaps he did an even better job of hiding them than we could ever have anticipated. Who knows, the only thing we've found so far are signs that such weapons did exist in Iraq, which is something we already knew.

I imagine in a few years, when Iraq has fallen into the hands of hardline Muslim fanatics, we'll see an Iraq that is perhaps increasingly more responsible for acts of terrorism against the US.

Tsukuru
07-10-2003, 11:04 PM
If you are George Bush and typed the country's name in the address bar, make sure that it is spelled correctly. (IRAQ).

Cracks me up every time. The funny part is that there has been evidence that Saddam was indeed telling the truth; it had no weapons of mass destruction. It seemed as if that was all we were focused on for the last year, finding weapons of mass destruction and stomping the out. Ironically, we attack the country we aren't 100% sure about, but let alone those that we know have nuclear weaponry.

Prrkitty
07-11-2003, 02:12 AM
OMG!! THAT was hillarious!!! Seemingly valid... yet totally bogus... akin to many things we deal with day to day. <lol>

TheGeepster
07-14-2003, 04:50 AM
Saddam disposed of his weapons without providing the proof that would have made his life MUCH easier?

Somehow I doubt that..