Will quests made in Beta 163 work in Full 1.92?

[Aegis Runestone]

That's my question. I accidently saved Warrior's Rise on Beta 54 but it STILL works on Beta 163....so will this 163 version work on full 1.92 ver of ZC?

[Jigglysaint]

possibly. I'm sure that there shouldn't be a problem. Heck, Nightmare's New Quest works in beta 163. I think it's only the quests that are made with other privite betas that are a problem, so you should have nothing to worry about.

[Teilyr]

Besides, you shouldn't have to worry about that for another 8 years. Unless something drastic changes, there should be no real problems with playability.

[Demimore]

the warriors rise, will you make it for 190 or 192?

[Raichu86]

There's always the risk, but DN says they're slim.

[MottZilla]

With the majority of quests nowdays being made in 163, I'm pretty sure DN will make sure quests are compatable with the latest version.

[Aegis Runestone]

Ok, thanx...Yes demiore....I'm defintiely fisnishing WR on 1.92

[Cyclone]

This should be one to look forward to.

However, note the rather large number of new bosses (as for how many, scan the beta reports and find out!)...so please don't give us 40-headed Gleeoks and all that jazz. :D

Cyclone

[Raichu86]

Don't give us a 40 headed Gleeok 2 either. :p

[Menokh]

First off, holy heck, Aegis is back!

Secondly, even if there is a direct compatibility problem I'm sure DN would include an upgrader of some kind.

[Verbatim]

I'd imagine there might be the kind of incompatibility between b163 and the next full release as there is between b163 and b152...people found that some bugs cropped up with that transition...not enough, though, by a long shot, that their work on b152 was wasted. Hopefully DN'll be able to make it a completely bug-free transition, though. I'm sure the fact that b163 was a public beta release will make forward compatibility an even higher priority than it was for 152, which was released to the quest contest participants.