Freedom Vs. Security

[zfreak2004]

Would you rather be totally free and have no security, totally secure and have no freedom. Or somewhere in the middle? :eyebrow: I'd like to be mostly free with enough security to protect me from most things that would seriously harm me.

[Samson007]

I say mostly free with some security because i dont like people tellin me what to do but i dont want to have to look over my shoulder every 5 seconds.

[DukenukemX]

I want to be totally free with no security. I don't need no big brother wana be on my back. :meanie:

There's something wrong with a person if they can't watch there own back.

I don't need cops telling me how fast I can drive, and Microsoft/Hollywood/Disney telling me what I can have and not have on my PC. :angry: I don't like it here or there. I don't like it anywhere. :reading:

I hate authority. :mad:

[vegeta1215]

Freedom and security. You can have both with Linux ;) And for the low cost of $0.00

[Paradox]

being secure doesn't always mean you can't be free.

[Icey]

Originally posted by Paradox
being secure doesn't always mean you can't be free.

Thats completely true and I agree. You dont need to sacrifice freedom for security

[Sugar]

I'd rather be totally free without security......

I dont really like people protecting me it just makes me feel wierd :confused:



*Sugar*

[Balister]

Security is good to have as long as it doesn't disrupt freedom.

[Sugar]

yeah i agree.....


but too much security bothers me



*Sugar*

[Drunken Tiger]

I chose option number two.. We should be all paranoid and lock ourselves in but we shouldnt act like we dont give a damn...