New Game - Boredom Hour

[DragonCommander]

OK, I got this idea for a new game...
I have a boredom rating, and need you guys to cheer me up. Anything goes (within the AGN rules of course ;D ) and I choose how much my boredom level goes up or down.
Only one thing can be tried at a time, and you can't try the same thing twice - be inventive.

: - ((((((((((((((((((((
20 boredom points currently.

[Paradox]

i just noticed part of your sig.... "i am now moocows bitch"

dude you are lucky to have someone (even if not in real life) seemingly like you. i, to my knowledge, have not had anyone like me or anything and i know lots of other people with this same problem. you gotta at least be happy about that dude...

a quick joke: a guy walked into a bar. he said ouch.

[DragonCommander]

LOL at your comment...
It's just this silly chat thing... I don't actually know moocow other than on chat, and it's all just a bit of fun.
EDIT: I just reread your comment and caught this:


(even if not in real life)

I doubt this will work - really. She seems to totally ignore me and treat me like scum... just like every other girl I've ever dated :(.
My boredom points: 22
(I omitted the smiley since it's clearer this way)
Reason: I've heard that joke before... it sucks.

[Smoke2001]

Okay here's a joke.

Okay this dude is walking down the sidewalk with a duck in his arms. This lady walks up to him and says "hey I'll fuck you for that duck" and of course he says okay......after words she says "that was so good that I'll give you your duck back." So he says cool. Now he's walking home and the duck slips out of his hands and gets run over by a truck driver in a semi. The guy gets out and says "oh I'm so sorry about that here's $20 dollars for that duck" He says okay. When he got home his wife asked how his day went. He says "oh it was great, let's see I got a fuck for a duck; a duck for a fuck; and $20 for a fucked up duck."

How was that.

[DragonCommander]

Boredom Points: 23
Reason: I've heard that one too... but it's better than Paradox's.

[Paradox]

nono you missed half the joke... (but im too lazy to repeat it, the punch line is there, so i dont care if you dont remember the rest)
another joke:

Why can't a blonde dial 911?

She can't find the 11 button.
:laughing:

[Elemental Knight]

Originally posted at http://www.hawking.org.uk/lectures/lindex.html :
In this lecture, I would like to discuss whether time itself has a beginning, and whether it will have an end. All the evidence seems to indicate, that the universe has not existed forever, but that it had a beginning, about 15 billion years ago. This is probably the most remarkable discovery of modern cosmology. Yet it is now taken for granted. We are not yet certain whether the universe will have an end. When I gave a lecture in Japan, I was asked not to mention the possible re-collapse of the universe, because it might affect the stock market. However, I can re-assure anyone who is nervous about their investments that it is a bit early to sell: even if the universe does come to an end, it won't be for at least twenty billion years. By that time, maybe the GATT trade agreement will have come into effect.

The time scale of the universe is very long compared to that for human life. It was therefore not surprising that until recently, the universe was thought to be essentially static, and unchanging in time. On the other hand, it must have been obvious, that society is evolving in culture and technology. This indicates that the present phase of human history can not have been going for more than a few thousand years. Otherwise, we would be more advanced than we are. It was therefore natural to believe that the human race, and maybe the whole universe, had a beginning in the fairly recent past. However, many people were unhappy with the idea that the universe had a beginning, because it seemed to imply the existence of a supernatural being who created the universe. They preferred to believe that the universe, and the human race, had existed forever. Their explanation for human progress was that there had been periodic floods, or other natural disasters, which repeatedly set back the human race to a primitive state.

This argument about whether or not the universe had a beginning, persisted into the 19th and 20th centuries. It was conducted mainly on the basis of theology and philosophy, with little consideration of observational evidence. This may have been reasonable, given the notoriously unreliable character of cosmological observations, until fairly recently. The cosmologist, Sir Arthur Eddington, once said, 'Don't worry if your theory doesn't agree with the observations, because they are probably wrong.' But if your theory disagrees with the Second Law of Thermodynamics, it is in bad trouble. In fact, the theory that the universe has existed forever is in serious difficulty with the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The Second Law, states that disorder always increases with time. Like the argument about human progress, it indicates that there must have been a beginning. Otherwise, the universe would be in a state of complete disorder by now, and everything would be at the same temperature. In an infinite and everlasting universe, every line of sight would end on the surface of a star. This would mean that the night sky would have been as bright as the surface of the Sun. The only way of avoiding this problem would be if, for some reason, the stars did not shine before a certain time.

This is continued at the URL listed above. To visit Stephen Hawking's main site, go to http://www.hawking.org.uk .

[DragonCommander]

Boredom Points: 21
Nice... mildly funny.
Next?